Breaking down the 60/40 portfolio

The percentages in a 60/40 portfolio refer to the investor’s asset allocation: Investors put 60 per cent of their money into riskier investments, like stocks. The other 40 per cent goes into traditionally safe investments, like government bonds.

This division of assets was originally designed to help investors protect their portfolios from the market’s volatility, while putting them in a good position to grow their money at a rate faster than inflation.

Advisors suggested over the years that investors rebalance their portfolios every year to maintain the 60/40 split. Say bonds went up in value the year before — individual investors should reallocate some of their money into stocks to ensure they’re back to the right mix.

Join Masterworks to invest in works by Banksy, Picasso, Kaws, and more. Use our special link to skip the waitlist and join an exclusive community of art investors.

Skip waitlist

Diminishing returns

For decades, financial advisors pushed this as the perfect balance, especially for a retirement portfolio.

However, current market conditions may actually slow your portfolio’s growth right now. With interest rates set to remain historically low for the next few years, a 40 per cent investment in bonds is unlikely to outpace rising inflation — which means those bonds will drag down a portfolio’s overall performance.

That’s not to say bonds can’t be a valuable addition for a certain investor’s portfolio. In fact, Vanguard Canada released a report this fall suggesting analysts aren’t keen to give up the balanced portfolio just yet. Even with inflation as a growing concern, they’re loath to throw out this time-tested strategy.

But many advisors argue bonds should no longer account for nearly half of the everyday investor's portfolio. They argue investors can look to other relatively safe bets, like blue-chip stocks and low-volatility exchange-traded funds, or ETFs. What really matters, experts say, is your financial goals.

New strategies

It's not just the 60/40 portfolio that’s going out of fashion. Advisors are increasingly steering clear of following hard-and-fast rules in general.

With more sophisticated tools to analyze a client’s risk tolerance and to allocate a customized portfolio, Tehranchian says those rules of thumb simply aren’t necessary anymore.

“These days, we have the technology and the tools available to do a much more detailed analysis for each client,” she says. “And then based on that more detailed analysis, we’re able to provide a customized portfolio that is not a cookie cutter portfolio like it used to be.”

These more personalized approaches mean clients walk away with a portfolio that reflects their reality rather than some idea of what their planner thinks their life should look like.

Which is much more effective, given that not everyone fits the mould or expectations of their age or income bracket.

Tehranchian says she works with financially conservative 20-somethings and 85-year-olds who forcefully reject investing in fixed income like bonds. Portfolios should reflect more than just someone’s age — other factors like their family situation, liquidity needs, estate plans, tax liabilities, income and financial goals must be considered as well.

“When you go to a financial planner, they need to know the full picture, because all of these things impact each other,” says Tehranchian. “It has to be holistic to work.”

Fine art as an investment

Stocks can be volatile, cryptos make big swings to either side, and even gold is not immune to the market’s ups and downs.

That’s why if you are looking for the ultimate hedge, it could be worthwhile to check out a real, but overlooked asset: fine art.

Contemporary artwork has outperformed the S&P 500 by a commanding 174% over the past 25 years, according to the Citi Global Art Market chart.

And it’s becoming a popular way to diversify because it’s a real physical asset with little correlation to the stock market.

On a scale of -1 to +1, with 0 representing no link at all, Citi found the correlation between contemporary art and the S&P 500 was just 0.12 during the past 25 years.

Earlier this year, Bank of America investment chief Michael Harnett singled out artwork as a sharp way to outperform over the next decade — due largely to the asset’s track record as an inflation hedge.

Investing in art by the likes of Banksy and Andy Warhol used to be an option only for the ultrarich. But with a new investing platform, you can invest in iconic artworks just like Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates do.

About the Author

Sigrid Forberg

Sigrid Forberg


Sigrid is a reporter with MoneyWise. Before joining the team, she worked for a B2B publication in the hardware and home improvement industry and ran an internal employee magazine for the federal government. As a graduate of the Carleton University Journalism program, she takes pride in telling informative, engaging and compelling stories.

What to Read Next


The content provided on MoneyWise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter.